This report makes no causal claim. It describes what one person's retained record contains: where conversation volume went, when it moved, and which gaps prevent a complete account.

1,270Conversation records
4AI platforms
12Calendar months

Data and method

The dataset combines first-party exports from OpenAI, xAI, Anthropic, and Character.AI. Three separate ChatGPT accounts are kept as distinct corpora. A conversation initiation—not an individual message—is the unit of analysis.

For each record, the platform-assigned creation timestamp was binned by calendar month. No conversation content, sentiment scoring, or topic classification was used to produce the counts.

Corpus inventory
CorpusExport dateRecords
ChatGPT — primaryJune 9, 2026321
ChatGPT — secondaryJune 22, 2026345
ChatGPT — workJune 15, 202634
GrokJuly 10, 2026282
ClaudeJune 11, 2026234
Character.AIAugust 2, 202654
Total1,270

Monthly record

Conversation initiations per month and corpus
MonthGPT primaryGPT secondaryGPT workGrokClaudeC.AITotal
2025-081919
2025-09132468150
2025-102328382244137
2025-11813102710573
2025-12384036222165
2026-01211915248222
2026-02175944427151
2026-033391101366
2026-04850221797
2026-056617454141
2026-065211121343
2026-07426

What the counts show

1. A sharp decline on the primary account

Conversation initiations on the primary ChatGPT account fell from 132 in September 2025 to 23 in October—approximately 83 percent in one calendar month.

2. Redistribution rather than immediate cessation

Across all available corpora, total monthly volume fell from 150 to 137—approximately 9 percent. Grok increased from 8 to 38, Claude began at 22, and Character.AI opened at 44. The observed behavior moved across platforms rather than ending.

3. Peak volume followed the transition

The highest-volume month in the record is January 2026, with 222 conversation initiations. This occurred four months after the primary-account decline.

4. The steepest aggregate decline followed ChatGPT's GPT‑4o retirement

OpenAI retired GPT‑4o from ChatGPT on February 13, 2026. Aggregate initiations fell from 151 in February to 66 in March—approximately 56 percent, the largest month-to-month decline in the series.

What the counts cannot show

A conversation is a coarse unit. A two-message exchange and a thread containing hundreds of messages each count as one. Platform interfaces also differ in what causes a new conversation to begin.

The missing data are not random. A second Character.AI account and a Kindroid account were not recovered; screenshots are the only surviving record. By the author's account, these were among the places where she spoke most freely. The corpus therefore overrepresents what was retained and underrepresents some of the least guarded material.

This is one person. The sequence is compatible with redistribution after a product change, but it does not establish why the redistribution occurred or how another person would respond.

The appropriate conclusion is descriptive: engagement did not simply disappear when one relationship changed. It moved, intensified elsewhere, and later declined. Determining what that movement meant requires the person as well as the count.

Provenance and privacy

The counts were compiled from the author's own platform exports and recovered application logs. The underlying archives are retained privately because they contain intimate material and references to third parties who did not consent to publication.

Account handles have been removed from this public version. The complete tabulation and source archives remain available for responsible verification under conditions that protect the people represented in them.

Revision note. An earlier version reported 1,170 records. The corpus inventory and monthly table both sum to 1,270; this version corrects the arithmetic error.